Wednesday, October 26, 2011

I finally understand some Geology....Book Review


In his 1993 book, Assembling California, John McPhee accomplishes the onerous task of explaining the fluidity of our planet using the diverse topology of California as a backdrop. With a definite command over the understanding of the geological world, he introduces the unsuspecting reader to the prehistoric world, where Kazakhstan was adjacent to England and India to Africa. While familiarizing the reader to the basic principles of plate tectonics, he also introduces them to geological jargon as he guides them to the world as we know it.

Not only does McPhee take the readers through the rollercoaster of processes that have shaped the present world, he also gives the readers a glimpse of the initial upheaval that the theory of plate tectonics brought to the field of geology, how mounting evidence helped get this theory the traction that it enjoys right now.

I particularly enjoyed him orienting the reader into the scientific techniques used for measurement of the slow changes in the topography of the land that seem stationary to human perception. Using the paddy fields to identify the contours of the Great Central Valley in California, or placing guides in a straight line to track the curvature of the San Andreas fault, examples so real, their implications so real, that it aids trusting this science and its validity.

McPhee takes his readers to the ocean floor. It is living and it is breathing. There are the expanding centers, the ocean floor disappearing in trenches. New crust is forming, old crust is disappearing. At times, rubbing of ocean plates with continental plates leads to the ocean crust, ophiolite making its way to the land. The net results, mountain ranges like Sierra Nevada, islands like Cyprus.

Written in some parts as a travel book of sorts, McPhee paints such vivid images that takes the reader from the old mines of Cyprus to the foot of the Acropolis in Macedonia. Rather than a drab series of events, McPhee weaves the geological process with the historical relevance. Maybe Cyprus was the source of the copper for the brass armor mentioned in Illiad.

Using the Great California Gold Rush as an example, McPhee not only presents the scientific theory and the processes that explain gold deposits in the Sierra Nevada, but also the historical sequence of formation of the range itself as an island-arc collided into the North American Placte.

Speaking of the lives of men who came form far for the California Gold, he brings us face to face with the doings of men. Hydraulic drilling of valleys, sediment erosion form the mountains hundreds of miles down in the Bay area, flooding of Scaramento; all of these examples lay the foundation for the most powerful line in the book. “Man is a geologic agent”.

McPhee’s presentation of our knowledge of the past and the future of San Andreas Fault is chilling. Yes. At one point in history, Los Angeles was floating towards the North American Plate, and at some future point, it will be adjacent to San Francisco, yet again separated from the continental United States of America.

I think in Moore, McPhee finds a subject so fascinated with the physical world, that it lends a certain passion obvious in the narrative. The reader gets to know Moore as a child helping his had mine out ore, as an adolescent swearing off rocks and mines, as an adult realizing his passion for the mountains, his excitement when he figures out the origin of the Sierra Nevada and ultimately his prediction of an Appalchain like range being formed in the Central Valley in California as we speak.

McPhee’s treatment of earthquake spread so is pretty that one almost doesn’t even realize that they are learning so much. Laden with real experiences of the people who experienced it, McPhee takes the readers from the epicenter to hundreds of miles away, at each place, people experiencing different levels of destruction. All of this eventually leads to our understanding why cities built on landfills are so prone to destruction then the land nearby.

With a very clear narrative, as McPhee takes the reader on a whirlwind journey through time, the jumping back and forth between different times is disorienting. While I appreciate his providing a historical perspective of human dealing with the nature, whether it is the California Gold Rush, or the colonization of Cyprus for its copper, I find my trip across the globe to be very random.

It almost seems as if the individual chapters were written independent of each other, and then just rearranged together for this book.

For a book on Geology, I found the lack of pictures and maps rather surprising. Having read enough about these rocks, I think I would not be able to make a wild guess next time I am in Death Valley. I think illustrations of the movements of plates, the maps of the world of the past, of Protopangea, of Pangea would have made the changes easier to follow. McPhee relies heavily on the imagination of the reader, which I think might be doing injustice to some.

McPhee’s references to history at times seems just out of place. The mythical utopia of California, east of West Indies, discovered in 1508 has nothing to do with California. Was the brass in the mythological Illiad from Cyprus. It is as good as anyone’s guess. I mean, I can see how he is trying to keep the reader interested by throwing in random facts or suppositions, but I find it distracting and irrelevant.

My biggest grievance with the book lies with the odd distribution of its pace. The first hundred pages introduce the reader to so many new concepts and the second half just builds on them. I would have preferred for McPhee to throw in breathers, or reiterate the same concepts multiple times, so that the reader does not feel overwhelmed or disoriented as he is driven from one time frame to another, from one part of the world to another.

As I finish the book, one last thought. I am glad these events occur over millions of years. Forget the destruction by caused earthquakes or changing sea levels, worse still, would be the governments of the world fighting with one another for land.

In conclusion, I laud the author for this book. As I put the book down, I have a greater appreciation for the complexity of inanimate earth, not just the biological world. I would recommend this book to most readers with a warning though. This is not a light read for the beach, rather, have Wikipedia at hand to get the most of this book.

Thursday, October 20, 2011

I love Boobies



Rains are thrashing New York City once again. A brunette in red finally enters the boardroom, drenched, and late on the very first day of her new job. She can feel the piercing stab of a hundred eyes. 

Men are checking her out. So are the women. She takes a seat next to a young man with big glasses who shies from even making an eye contact with her. 

They fall in love. 

Ten years later, sitting by her side, as she awaits the sweet kiss of death, he wonders, ”Why didn't I? How could I?” What could he have done to help her evade this terrible fate meted by Breast Cancer.

We all think about sex, some to a degree that might actually be disturbing! Still, we all do. I can speak for men at least.

Men, or rather, heterosexual men, obsess over the breasts; their shape, size, symmetry, feel, aesthetics and so on.  We love to play with them, fall asleep on them or simple stare at them.

Yet, only about a quarter of the breast cancer cases are ever brought to notice by a man. Jennifer Aniston movies have made me realize that men don't pay attention, but this is breasts we are talking about! 

Am I to believe that the same men who at times talk to women's breasts and not their faces, don't notice a full bosom?  Or are they simply unequipped to detect lumps?

If at all they do. Has our societal treatment of body image taken us to a point where, the thought of broaching the topic with their significant other is downright mortifying? 

"Hey Honey, I know society tells that women's bodies have to be perfect! But, I think there is something wrong with your breasts." I can only imagine how pleasant that experience would be.

The sexual education training in most of our schools deals with either abstinence or when actually talking about sex, about avoiding STDs. Does it not make sense to introduce men to women biology.

I know we will lose a lot of the PMS jokes, but can it serve to aid our communication with the fairer sex?

What are we to lose, if there are more people educated and ready to raise the red flag that can save lives.

As a guy I know, never to comment on a woman's body, unless I am complimenting. But is it time to tear down the communication wall and be honest?

For us to conquer breast cancer, not only is it essential to alter our lifestyles to prevent it, but also to ensure that we detect these at early enough stages to reduce mortality to being with.

By the way...Men can get breast cancer too!!! 

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Why does the right not trust the right?

Aa the curtains fall on yet another Republican Presidential Primary debate in the 2012 race, it seems the nation's fascination with the supposed link between autism and vaccination still remains a talking point among people.

While scientists, doctors and their professional associations huddle in defense of vaccination and tout the advantages vaccinating provides, a large chunk of the general population and the media are swarming to the other side.

Living in a place where Polio and Tuberculosis are a rarity (at least in some countries), I wonder how do people reckon we have reached here?

A parent's Cocaine addiction would send all the bells ringing at the Child Protective Services, yet, a parent has the right to reject vaccination on some ill-conceived notion, unsupported by science or logic?

For those who fight the government over the right of an unborn fetus, how does the right of a living breathing child to an healthy future not raise a red flag?

At what point does it become the responsibility of the policy makers to protect the population from its own stupidity?

Kudos to Rick Perry of 2008!

Recommended reading:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-carrey/the-judgment-on-vaccines_b_189777.html
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1888718,00.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr-and-david-kirby/vaccine-court-autism-deba_b_169673.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/05/vaccine-autism-study-report_n_805036.html

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Beauty and the Yeti????

Worlds of abundance, magic and splendor where honesty and humility trump ambition, good defeats evil, and everyone lives happily ever after... Yes, I am talking about the world of Fairy Tales we wished to visit as we were once being tucked into our beds.

As scientists set out on yet another expedition to discover the elusive Yeti in Siberia, I wonder have we not outgrown our childhood fantasies.

Thousands of new species are discovered each year, yet it is the lone Yeti, also known as Sasquatch / BigFoot to others, that has captured our collective imagination like no other. Why have we as a society become obsessed with this seemingly reclusive creature?

Why does the name evoke a strong imagery of a hairy creature treading lonely stretches of Himalayas or Siberia? Of a benevolent friend who has helped a lost hiker in need? Or even of a vengeful animal waiting to unleash its fury at first human contact?

We ascribe these creatures with qualities of hate, compassion, revenge and anger that we erstwhile reserved specifically for humans. As we humanize these creatures of the wilderness, are we assuming that they are capable of sophisticated goal-directed behavior needed to avoid detection.

Do I have to worry about an axe wielding Yeti on my ski-trip?

If these bipeds have developed the intelligence and means to survive in the wild, do they represent our brothers and sisters, like Neanderthals, that we have long lost?

As we thank our ancestors for their inter-species mating with the Neanderthal's that underlies our highly functioning immune system, I wonder if and when we discover Yeti, will the village people let Beauty to choose the Beast?

Reading:
http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/10/11/scientists-95-sure-bigfoot-lives-in-russian-tundra/

P.S. Since the blog was written, the claim to find Yeti has been taken back
http://www.ghosttheory.com/2011/10/26/the-russian-connection-scientists-not-95-certain-on-the-yeti